The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 16:28, 11 April 2009 [1].
I am nominating this for featured article because it was significantly expanded and improved since it obtained GA status and was peer reviewed. The article covers the history of one of the most prominent historical sites in Central London. In 2008 the market was at the center of a violent debate on demolition and redevelopment, that opposed developers, architects, the Corporation of London, several British heritage associations and the UK Ministry of Culture, and received a major coverage in the press. DarTar ( talk) 16:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments by User:Nev1
A nice article, but these issues need to be resolved before I can support. I've made these edits to the article, mainly some minor copyediting, but you may want to check to it over to make sure it doesn't inadvertently change the meaning of anything, such as when I was decapitalising City. Nev1 ( talk) 17:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment
Oppose Not comprehensive and not neutral enough.
Oppose based on sourcing and structure.
Karanacs ( talk) 14:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply