This is the main
Pokémon article. I'd like to thank all of its editors for getting it good enough to be featured status. I reviewd the article, and think that it has great information, and good enough for featured status, please write your comments, regards
Poke Master (
Talk •
Contribs)
19:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Object. Much of this information needs to be moved to sub-articles (most of which already exist), the Criticism section is poorly cited and weaselriffic, and the prose is less than brilliant. This still needs work. -
A Man In Bl♟ck (
conspire |
past ops)
21:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose, bad grammar (going from the bottom up, the first words, "potential objectional content" should be "potentially objectionable content", to start!), dense prose with long spans without any kind of illustration, too much emphasis on lists and unverifiable details (e.g. "Another theory is that Pokémon is based in the future, as technology is fairly advanced and Earth is seen in basically all of the movies." Source?), stubby sections, and lack of references are just the cherry on the top of the cake. While
Article size is a good
guideline for most topics, for this one, it may be a good idea to ignore it (as it isn't policy) if sections need further expansion, as they do in this case.
Titoxd(
?!?)23:25, 26 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose, per above. Also, it is my opinion that an article should not be nominated until all [citation needed]s are met. Honestly, and in no offense to anyone, this nomination was very premature.
It can be improved by reducing links to solitary years. In this article, there is only link: '1996'. A monobook tool allows this to be done with one click on a 'dates' tab in edit mode. You can then accept or reject the changes offered and/or do more editing before pressing 'Save'. Simply copy the entire contents of
User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. Then follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. Hope that helps.
bobblewik19:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply