The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 21:34, 15 March 2009 [1].
As an artist, this place has captured my imagination, both in the intellectual understanding of beauty and the fear that one of my pieces will show up here someday. This article has gone through a complete rewrite in the past week, and in the interest of transparency it is for the main page on April 1. This is a real place, evidenced by the all the sources. The article reflects the "wtf"? tone of the sources that have reported on it since 1994, as well as the sincere discussion on what is considered beautiful, and why museums and galleries are required to tell people what kind of art should be valued. I appreciate the time you take to read it and give your opinions. Ealdgyth, I must say for your edification, this is the first article I have ever written where I sought a citation from The National Enquirer. How unfortunate that I ended up not needing it. Moni3 ( talk) 15:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC) reply
More later (this review is likely to be pretty haphazard, I'm afriad). Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 08:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment -- External links and dabs (found using the checker tools), and ref formatting (found using WP:REFTOOLS) are all up to speed.-- ₮RU CӨ 02:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Support an article too good to be ignored about "art too bad to be ignored" Were Spiel Chequers 20:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Support - I went through the article just now, but there wasn't much to do in terms of copy-editing. Please check what I did so this gem can shine as brightly as possible on April 1. Giants2008 ( 17-14) 02:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Support - But of course I have no taste. LeadSongDog ( talk) 05:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC) reply