The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 23:07, 13 December 2008 [1].
After working on this article for over a month, I believe it's ready. Gary King ( talk) 04:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Image review
Oppose - man, you really don't waste time with closing them Peer Reviews, eh? Looks close, but there are some issues with the prose that need to be addressed:
changed to support 21:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Please reply to the above in a block below so I can keep track of what's being done and all. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 02:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comments:
Okay that's about it; you'll notice that I've copyedited the article partially for simple issues. Most of these can be resolved easily, although "Story" and "Reception" issues could take time if you decide change the style of each. Happy editing. Thanks. Ashnard Talk Contribs 12:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The article looks pretty good. The only things that stood out to me were some style and prose issues.
The article looks very good. Once these issues are addressed, I'll be happy to support. ( Guyinblack25 talk 22:34, 8 December 2008 (UTC)) reply