The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 19:12, 10 October 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I feel the article meets the featured article criteria. It is a well cited and comprehensive account of one of Capcom's best selling games. The primary editors have made great strides bringing this article up to A-class, and I feel that it deserves FA status. Lumaga ( talk) 00:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC) reply
TwilligToves- I did some tweaks to address the issues above. To answer some of your questions.
I'll be honest with you. I do not believe the prose will improve beyond what is already there nor will the development section be expanded further. I'm an above average copy editor at best and I took the article as far as I know how to a number of months ago. I looked through a number of print and online sources (both old and new) and did not find beyond what is in the article. If the article warrants opposition from you, then please do what you feel is necessary. ( Guyinblack25 talk 17:08, 30 September 2009 (UTC)) reply
Comment Refs mix
ISO-style (YYYY-MM-DD) and
Month Day, Year dates.
Use one for all of them. I suggest Month Day, Year. --
an
odd
name
17:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
reply