The article was not promoted by User:Raul654 01:37, 27 May 2008 [1].
Support I feel that this article has improved so much since last year that it should be featured. It already has "good article" status, but I think it's a great article. QuirkyAndSuch ( talk) 01:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC) reply
-- Guroadrunner ( talk) 16:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC) reply"Just because I voted for Dennis Kucinich doesn't mean that I'm going to nominate his article instead of the Hillary one ... I nominated this one because I felt that it was a really good article and should be featured despite my personal preference." (italics mine)
-- Guroadrunner ( talk) 20:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment: At the top of this page (Wikipedia:FAC) it says: "For a nomination to be promoted to FA status, consensus must be achieved that it meets the FA criteria". The link on consensus doesn't define it in the review process, but my common-sense assumption is that all, or a very significant majority, of FAC reviewers must support a nomination before a consensus can be declared. On the basis of the discussions on this page, that situation will never be achieved on Hillary Rodham Clinton. Supports and opposes have been more or less balanced since the nomination began; each new support gets a balancing oppose, and vice versa. So, with two strong forces diametrically opposing each other, the nomination is about as far from achieving consensus as it is possible to be, yet it remains open. Is there a justification for this? Brianboulton ( talk) 14:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The writing is almost there, and this probably should be promoted if it's polished up. Here are bits at random that I caught. The whole text should be sifted through by someone new; surely it won't be hard to find a word-nerd for this? Not a long job.
Support: I like it. -- Kill Nu metal ( talk) 11:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Support: The article is no more unstable than I am. :-) see this diff. Ferrylodge ( talk) 15:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
vv052400
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).cnn040107
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).fox100307
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).