The article was promoted 18:52, 24 February 2007.
Self-nomination A "good article" meeting fac. DrKiernan 08:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC) reply
Weak Oppose and Conditional Support Support. I agree with JHMM13 that the article needs a larger lead and more citations as some sections do not have any. I also think that the article needs a seperate references section. If my concerns are adressed I would be more than happy to support the article.
Kyriakos
06:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
Oppose. I thing this artcle can't be Featured article.-- Absar 12:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply
I'm sorry but after some thought I've decided not to continue with this proposal. I just don't understand how an article like
George IV of the United Kingdom can be the Main Page Featured Article in April when it has no citations, and includes comments like "...every time he had intimate relations with a woman he would cut a lock of her hair and place it in an envelope with her name on it. At the time of his death there were allegedly 7,000 such envelopes." Whilst at the same time you oppose FA status for my article because of "Improper referencing" even though it contains no contested comments and is fully referenced.
(1) As I am not able to understand your criticisms, I consequently cannot address them.
(2) I think my limited time would be better spent improving what I consider a bad article like George IV, rather than improving an already good article like George I into a fantastic one.
Please close the discussion and accept my apologies for wasting your time. I would prefer not to enter into correspondence on this matter.
DrKiernan
12:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
reply