"Being an expansion pack that requires the main game, the S.P.E.C.I.A.L. and V.A.T.S. systems carry over." This is tricky for someone who doesn't know the games well.
- Explained it a better
"the
season pass price was increased" I don't understand. What's a season pass in this context? Increased relative to what? By whom?
- I've added what a season pass is in this case, but I don't understand what you mean by "Increased relative to what".
- "Similar to the base game, in which the player character is tasked with finding their lost family,[2] Far Harbor has the player controls the Sole Survivor, who is enlisted by the Valentine Detective Agency—an company run by detective Nick Valentine—to investigate a disappearance, this time of a young girl named Kasumi." This sentence (which I've tweaked) is a bit too long. Also, I don't know what "the Sole Survivor" is.
- Cut it down a bit, is it better now?
- "While using V.A.T.S. (Vault-Tec Assisted Targeting System), a feature first introduced in Fallout 3, the real-time combat is slowed, allowing the player to choose where to shoot the enemy." This is the first mention of combat or enemies. Give us context! I am left wondering how necessary these kinds of details are; discussion of the basic gameplay of Fallout is good, too many details about how combat works (unless specific to this expansion) probably are not needed.
- I've rearranged the gameplay section so that it mentions the enemy NPC before V.A.T.S., is it better now?
- I suppose my question is why we're talking about VATS and Power Armour and SPECIAL and whatnot at all. The information seems very specific; in this article, we need to get a general idea of how gameplay works in Fallout 4 and a specific idea of what the gameplay is in this expansion (and/or how the gameplay in this expansion differs from the gameplay in Fallout 4). This seems to be specific information about gameplay which is not unique to this expansion and nor is it necessary to understand this expansion. Or am I going wrong somewhere?
Josh Milburn (
talk)
04:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
J Milburn: I included the information about the vital parts of the base game because it was suggested by
Czar in the
first peer review:
- Part of the nature of a standalone DLC article is that you'll need sources from the original article to explain the basic gameplay. You should assume that readers have only a cursory knowledge of video games but want to know about this topic, so they likely don't know much about Fallout 4 and would need to know its basic gameplay to understand what Far Harbor adds. In terms of being true to the sources, I would preface such a recap as: "Far Harbor is an expansion of the main game, Fallout 4. It builds upon the basic game, which ..." so it's clear that the basic game explanation can come from sources about the basic game.
- along with: Work from the assumption that the reader is competent but doesn't know anything about Fallout—what is the game about? What do you do? What kinds of mechanics does it have? It only needs to be cursory and you can direct them back at F4's article for more info, but it should at least tell you how the game plays—it's not exempt from that simply because it's an article that expands on the original.
- I read those messages as a sort of "try to include basic information on the base game's mechanics as the reader may not know anything about Fallout".
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
04:37, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I agree entirely with Czar; I'm just not convinced that this is what you're doing. Let's try it like this; in order to understand what Ned Flanders adds to The Simpsons, I need to know a bit about Springfield, I need to know a bit about the Simpson family, I need to know a bit about the kind of humour there is on The Simpsons, I need to know a good bit about Homer, and I need to have an idea of the role religion plays in the series. I don't need to know anything about Springfield Elementary School or the Springfield Power Plant. If I want to know about Ralph Wiggum, I'm going to need to know a bit about Springfield Elementary, but very little about Homer and nothing about religion. If I want to know about Smithers, I need to know about the Power Plant. And so on. So, if we're writing about Far Habor, we have to ask what in the base game we need to know about to get why Far Habor matters and what it does. Do we need to know about Springfield Elementary? The Power Plant? Both? Neither?
Josh Milburn (
talk)
04:48, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
J Milburn: Hmm, fair enough. I think the S.P.E.C.I.A.L. section can be removed because it's early-game Fallout stuff, but I think the V.A.T.S. and Pip-boy can stay because during combat [in Far Harbor], V.A.T.S. still plays a big role. The Pip-boy is used in Far Harbor for the map feature (
example source) and the player will receive a message on the Pip-boy when they can visit it (
source. I'll update the article accordingly.
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
05:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
"Weapons can also be shot at, disarming them." One does not disarm weapons, one disarms an opponent of weapons.
- Fixed.
"Unlike the previous iterations" Of what?
- Fixed.
"Even quests done back at the Commonwealth will affect the story" The tone's a bit off, here, and I think more explanation is needed.
- I don't remember reading about that or adding that and it's not found in the given reference so I've removed that sentence.
"The Island, where many of the creatures native to it reside" Huh?
- Changed to "The Island, where many creatures reside".
- "The town uses fog condensers which turn the fog into liquid in order to protect its inhabitants, due to the creature's unwillingness to go anywhere without fog." No idea. What creature?
- Does the previous change help answer this?
- Do you mean creatures-apostrophe rather than creature-apostrophe-s?
Josh Milburn (
talk)
03:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
J Milburn: Yes, it was fixed by
Prisonermonkeys.
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
03:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Uh-huh. It was written in the possessive when it should have been plural possessive.
Prisonermonkeys (
talk)
03:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
reply
"who is against the destruction of the Church of Atom" Context?
- Reworded the sentence and removed that bit.
"The Children of Atom reside in an old nuclear submarine base called The Nucleus and are led by High Confessor Tektus, a fanatically devout follower of Atom who seeks to disable or destroy the fog condensers, since the Church believes that The Island is the holy land of Atom, and the contraptions' mere existence are an affront to him." Too long. Also, singular/plural confusion.
- Fixed.
What are Synths? Also, Synths or synths?
- I thought I fixed that, obviously not. Fixed now. Changed all to "synths/synth".
"Kasumi Nakano, the person the Sole Survivor is tasked with finding, resides in Acadia." Presumably you mean to say she resided there before she went missing? You should check your other mentions of the character, too.
- She fled there. Fixed wording.
"The expansion starts after the end of the "Getting a Clue" quest." Context? The way you've written this, it's like you expect readers to know what this means.
- Expanded.
"Children of Atom's base of Operations" operations?
- Fixed.
"three main Factions there and let them decide their fate themselves" Capital F? Also, the "their" is ambiguous.
- Fixed.
- "dungeons" is jargon
- Don't really know how I can fix this, the reference says "dungeons".
"It added the largest landmass, hence the higher price compared to other DLC releases." Again, this is the first mention of a higher price. How about something like "Of the three, it added the largest landmass, and hence was sold for the highest price."
- Reworded.
"The expansion was included in the Fallout 4 season pass, the price of which rose from US$30 to $50 due to the large amount of additional content." As above, I'm afraid I don't know what this means.
- Reworded.
"and didn't turn out as they planned" Informal, ambiguous. Also, whose feedback? Players'?
- Reworded.
"the game worked better." Informal
- Reworded.
" but many, including Metro" First, I'm not keen on the personification; second, you don't cite Metro at the end of the sentence?
- I've changed it a bit. It's actually "GameCentral", but I've fixed the issues.
Gotta dash; I'll be back for more...
Josh Milburn (
talk)
22:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
reply
Ok, back.
"block-related parts were compared" What are these?
- The block sections are explained in the gameplay section: In some of the puzzle rooms, the player directs
lasers to hit the designated targets, and in other puzzle rooms the player builds using blocks, similar to
Minecraft.
"Peter Brown (GameSpot) commended the addition of "hours of side quests driven by curious characters" added." ?
- Removed the "added" at the end.
I generally find the reception section a little repetitive. For a slightly ironic example, consider the multiple times you mention that reviewers found the game repetitive.
- I think I've fixed it.
"in the article by Paget" What article by Paget? This is the first mention.
- Fixed.
|