The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 02:05, 9 July 2008 [1].
Self-nominator: I'm nominating this article for featured article because i've been working on it quite a lot and hope it meets all FA criteria currently. The article successfully undergone an A-class review in January. However, after the A-class review i've made some major improvements especially in the referencing and supporting materials sectors. The promotion of this important article would be a benefit for Wikipedia and the Military history WikiProject, as it is rated nr. 10 on WP:MHSP. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 18:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose; I have absolutely no idea how I supported last time (I guess I've gotten pickier?) since the prose could do with a lot of work. I stress that the following are most certainly not all the problems in the article, and are only a representative sample taken solely from the lead.
Nousernamesleft ( talk) 01:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose This article tackles an enormous topic and does it reasonably well, but I'm not sure that it should be featured yet. I have some concerns about balance, comprehensiveness, prose, and images:
I look forward to seeing this article improved and brought back to FAC. I have every confidence that it can pass with some more work. Awadewit ( talk) 18:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC) reply