The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot ( talk) 12:30, 21 May 2015 [1].
This article is about... a commemorative coin that didn't commemorate anything, and was conceived, by all accounts, as a way of extracting money from collector's pockets. Which it quite successfully did. These things happened in other issues, but this may be the extreme example. Wehwalt ( talk) 11:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Image review
A few minor points.
-- Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 19:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Support Everything looks good to me! I corrected a few small MOS issues, but it seems fine otherwise. This is a fine article on the subject of one of the most infamous, but interesting, early U.S. commemorative coins.- RHM22 ( talk) 02:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Source review The sources used are all appropriate, as is the level of citation in the article. The only tiny inconsistency I can see is that, in the bibliography, you abbreviate states with postal abbreviations, but use the traditional "D.C." for Washington. Otherwise, all good. -- Coemgenus ( talk) 12:18, 14 May 2015 (UTC) reply