The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 01:23, 8 June 2008 [1].
After much work, I believe this article now passes all FA criteria. It is comprehensive, well cited, numerous complimentary images and remains focussed on the topic. Currently a GA, and I look forward to all feedback. Self-nom Reso lute 15:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments - I'm first up, so here are my comments so far.
More later Giants2008 ( talk) 18:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments Support (04:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC))
dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 10:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Support - All my concerns above were addressed, so this article gets a thumbs-up from me. Giants2008 ( talk) 23:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Personally, I disagree that the article is too heavy on tables and statistics. Sports, by its nature, lends itself to tables and statistics. Given this, I believe that the weighting of tables is appropriate to the subject and the expectations of the intended audience. As an example of this, this is how a recent edition of the Hitmen game program is formatted:
I've used prose to introduce list/chart sections, where appropriate, and personally believe the article will suffer if some of the charts are removed. Reso lute 00:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC) reply
But more importantly: