The article was not promoted by Ucucha 21:22, 22 February 2012 [1].
Broken Sword: The Shadow of the Templars ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because... it's a GA, and has been peer reviewed. I believe it's ready for FA. :) Khanassassin ☪ 14:09, 19 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Oppose per Hahnchen. Not comprehensive. Also, relies on some questionable sources. No indication of how Game Over Online and Mr Bill meet WP:RS. -- Laser brain (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Reluctant oppose I peer reviewed this and the comments migrated from the PR page to Khanassassin's talk page. When I was asked if the PR was done, I replied in part The language needs work and I think the plot section could be made more concise. If you get those taken care of and want me to take a second look, please ping me then diff. To my mind this meant that the artcile was not ready for FAC (as the goal of the PR was stated to be FA), although I did not say so explicitly. No edits of any kind were made to the article after I made these comments and before it was nominated at FAC. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 19:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply