The article was promoted by Karanacs 02:31, 28 December 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I apparently want to make my home province look like a banana republic. Seriously: this legislation was so offensive that the Supreme Court of Canada decided to pretend that Canada's constitution included a bill of rights so they'd have some basis on which to disallow it.
Also, the article is quite short, so if you want to feel like you're doing your part to ease the FAC backlog without actually doing much work (that's certainly my objective), this article might be a good one to review. Steve Smith ( talk) 20:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments
-- an odd name 05:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Source comments Everything fine. RB88 ( T) 04:43, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Support: Although short, the article seems comprehensive, and it's certainly well-written. When I peer-reviewed this article, I liked it a lot, and I haven't changed my mind. On a re-read just now, I found only one quibble to raise. Should Alberta Online Encyclopedia in citation 32 be in italics, and is the publisher Heritage Community Foundation rather than the encyclopedia? Nice article. Finetooth ( talk) 00:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments Support: I am close to supporting this article, which is well-written and details quite a fair bit over a controversial act. I believe, however, there are some issues that need resolving:
I will support once the above are resolved. Jappalang ( talk) 02:01, 23 December 2009 (UTC) reply