From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Contributor(s):
mav,
Stone,
Nergaal,
Double sharp,
R8R Gtrs,
Materialscientist,
WP Elements
I feel this topic meets the good topic criteria as it is very comprehensive and its articles are all of high quality. Also, this topic would be the second GT for
WikiProject Elements.
Double sharp (
talk)
02:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
reply
Comment:
Mercury has an unresolved NPOV tag;
Copernicium has three citation needed tags (though one is in the lead so it might not be needed if it's supported later on).
GRAPPLE
X 02:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC) Support.
GRAPPLE
X
10:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Support, although unsure if there's a reference for 285bCn and clueless like Derpy Hooves at the reason for the NPOV tag at Hg.
Freywa
Parcly
Taxel
20% Cooler
05:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Support
once the NPOV tag on mercury has been resolved. Until then, oppose.
String
Theory
11
18:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Support--topic meets the criteria.
Rreagan007 (
talk)
00:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Comment Several deadlinks are present in most of these articles. Check with the 'ext links' tool of the book reports for greater detail.
Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books}
18:54, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Support as long as the inline cleanup tags in
Copernicium are resolved. —
Andrew
s
talk
00:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Support:
Once issues have been fixedCompletely.--
Gen. Quon (
talk)
19:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
reply