A political theorist and his two books. I know that he has plans for another book, but I can't see it appearing for a while yet, and, even when it does (due to the "speed" of academic publishing) it won't have sufficient coverage to be considered notable for a while longer. --
Josh Milburn (
talk)
11:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Support Comment -- Tks for this series of articles, Josh. Just procedurally, I think we're supposed to put a link to the nomination on the article talk pages -- seem to recall it being in the instructions anyway... Content-wise, did you consider whether
Centre for Animals and Social Justice should be part of the topic given Cochrane's a founder member? Cheers,
Ian Rose (
talk)
21:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)reply
P.S. Excellent work getting such an engaging photo of the subject! Cheers,
Ian Rose (
talk)!
Not saying it should. I mean if the topic is the guy and his works (i.e. his notable literary output) then CASJ isn't necessary and the topic is comprehensive. Cheers,
Ian Rose (
talk)
23:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)reply
I had a think on this; a number of people are affiliated with the centre, and other founding members include
Dan Lyons and
Robert Garner. The centre could probably be a topic in its own right, but if the article was going to go into a particular person's topic, it would be Lyons's.
Josh Milburn (
talk)
08:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Is that necessary? The article on Cochrane is on the animal rights template, while one of the books is on another navbox; I'm not sure creating a new navbox with three articles (and three articles which all link to each other quite heavily) would be that beneficial.
Josh Milburn (
talk)
17:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply