I believe the article meets the Good Topic criteria. It includes a set of similar, interrelated articles that cover a specific topic, which are all GA Class or above. --
Jim Sweeney (
talk)
08:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment articles are free of disambiguation links. all external links seem to be working.
Alt text however, is in dire need of attention. In most of the articles. Not a reason to object, but since we're paying attention to the topic, might a well keep our readers with visual difficulties in mind. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books}18:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
All geoocordinates added except for Operation Turkey Buzzard which covered 3,200 miles from England to North Africa. If required can you suggest where its located?
Jim Sweeney (
talk)
19:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Bad referencing in certain placesReflinks is trying to change several named references. This is usually do to a mismatch, such as using "<ref name=mitch156>Mitcham 2007, p.158</ref>" in one place, and "<ref name=mitch156>Mitcham 2007, p.156</ref>" in the other. Headbomb {
talk /
contribs /
physics /
books}19:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I had not considered Browning, but the North Africa operation was not carried out by the 1st Airborne Division, just the 1st Parachute Brigade in an independent role.
Jim Sweeney (
talk)
06:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment In the footnotes section of the lead article I'm seeing three long gibberish strings, the first being "?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000004-QINU?2?UNIQ516aa7fbef5695e-nowiki-00000005-QINU?". Is this on my end or is something broken over there?
Sven ManguardWha?17:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes logged out and get the same, it seems to link to the citation but instead of [22] has the uni-code. I have never seen it before and would not know how to fix it. Its strange as its not happening with other citations and a quick spot check of the other articles does not display the same.
Jim Sweeney (
talk)
11:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)reply