Emochila (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) ( restore | cache | AfD)

For the page Emochila, I have been working hard with GRuban to get the proper articles and notibility for in order to get a Keep status on the article. Please reference the article's discussion section where GRuban was telling me the necessary steps. On August 16, GRuban said the article met the standards, and you can see that he placed a Keep on the article.

Not more than an hour later, someone was agitated that their comment was deleted from the talk pages, and the article was then deleted. I do not know if the person who issued the delete was the same person, as only their IP address shows. However, they say that the article is spam and written by officers of the firm. Well, if GRuban issued a Keep, it was not spam, as it contains the proper notability and article references. Furthermore, I am not an officer of Emochila.

I'm requesting that this page be reinstated to a Keep as originally authorized by GRuban. He was very helpful, and I followed his instructions to a T, rather than the Delete that was issued on rubbish and, frankly, points that were simply untrue. Kwintern ( talk) 21:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply

• Comment from closing admin Though I cannot restore the page and close the AfD, I'm quite happy to relist the AfD, which I'm doing now. It was in the backlog with two arguments to delete, so it was done, but a firmer consensus is likely to make the issue clearer. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:41, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply

• Addendum Relisted at the current log. It appears it was also relisted yesterday, but was never removed from the archive. I've fixed this. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:49, 17 August 2008 (UTC) reply