From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

15 April 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-04-15 Edit

2010-04-15 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. The leftorium 15:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 17:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 17:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Recreated without copyvio. VernoWhitney ( talk) 17:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 18:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 12:23, 16 April 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney ( talk) 01:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Mirror site. VernoWhitney ( talk) 01:38, 16 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. The selected bibliography was a problem, and I could not determine the origin of most of the text in the article. In accordance with that foundational issue and Wikipedia:Copyright violations' support of presumptive removal in these cases, I've replaced and have asked for help at the relevant project in expanding. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:14, 23 April 2010 (UTC) reply



  • Copyright concerns remain. Article deleted or tagged for speedy deletion. Text development appears to have been made on planetphysics first (it grew out of a stub there, while it was added as one piece here). MLauba ( Talk) 09:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Seems this one is a licensing vio; redirected to original article. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:43, 23 April 2010 (UTC) reply