The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The only article in the category is already present in
Category:Horrid Henry, and is not centric on the character themselves. Could be made into a "character redirects to list" category, but it does not seem like there are enough redirects for that.
(Oinkers42) (
talk)
22:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nexter Systems
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support: This category should match the article, which more importantly matches the current (as of 2024) official name of the extant organization. I have also prepared a CfD on Commons to change it there as well.
Josh (
talk)
23:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
EstcatCountry categories
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Eiei-year tracking categories
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: These single-article (minus the eponymous article) Formula One driver eponymous categories are unnecessary per
WP:OCEPON. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me05:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Buildings and structures by decade 530s-990s
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge, in this period this is a redundant category layer with only occasional articles next to the religious buildings subcategory. The articles need to be moved manually because some of them are already in e.g. a fortifications by century subcategory or in an establishments by year subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
05:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Old style serif typefaces
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's Rationale: In
Vox-ATypI classification#Classicals, Old style serif typefaces can be categorized into 3 subclasses. All of these 3 subclasses has their own categories in French Wikipedia. However, only 2 out of 3 of those French Wikipedia categories has a corresponding category in English Wikipedia:
@
Blythwood: given your earlier contributions noted on the talk page, can you comment on this, please? I am not familiar with the topic, but I think your comment there implies that the nomination is correct. –
FayenaticLondon11:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep – thanks for pinging me. Garalde and Venetian are sub-genres of old-style types, but they aren't all-encompassing. Designs like
Trinité or
Arno may not neatly fit into either genre (something the
specimen comments on, see page 6). So I think "Old style serif typefaces" is worth retaining as a main category with Garalde and Venetian as subcategories.
Blythwood (
talk)
15:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi, thanks for the ping. I wouldn't make that move because transitional types are (as the name suggests) in between old-style and Didone designs, they're a genre by themself; see the
serif article for how it explains this. Happy to give more references and commentary if needed.
Blythwood (
talk)
17:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Spelling change - what might seem contemporary in some contexts may not be understood clearly as to the specific starting point is actually contemporary or not
JarrahTree08:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Any more comments on the alt rename? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk10:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Rename target still needs to be decided upon. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/they)
01:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Looking at both the Indonesian and Malaysian history timelines and the organisation of the periods of time, the suggested name with date-present is ok.
JarrahTree08:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Phobias
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
@
Genericusername57: I agree that, e.g., mormonophobia has attributes that claustrophobia does not, but I also think that it is not random chance that words like "mormonophobia" contain "phobia". Many of these prejudices originated with and continue to be based upon substantial amounts of irrational fear. For example, when it has something to do with sexuality or gender (e.g., homophobia, transphobia), there is a substantial element of irrational fear that the feared individuals will groom, assault, or otherwise be harmful to children. What do you think about double listing homophobia, transphobia, mormonophobia, and similar as bothCategory:Phobias and
Category:Prejudice and discrimination? —
Quantling (
talk |
contribs)
19:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The immediate proposal has been
WP:BOLDly adopted (as it did not actually require a CFD to take place), but the D in CFD is for discussion and I am relisting so that
User:Quantling's point can be discussed. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/they)
01:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:DVD interactive technology
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:no consensus. There is weak consensus that the category should not exist in its current form, but I find there is no consensus either to delete or rename the category, possibly because the debate became bifurcated between these two options. Given that the CFD ran for over a month, it does not seem to me that a third relist will be productive, so I will instead say that there is
no prejudice against speedy renomination.
I'm not a CFD regular so if I have punted any of the technical steps here please feel free to go ahead and fix them or bug me on my talk page (an idiot's guide would be appreciated).
Stifle (
talk)
08:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: More common name, I don't hear "DVD interactive technology" as often. Also, the original name omits the usage of "games".
QuantumFoam66 (
talk)
05:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose Many games come on DVD, so this proposed title is too vague to ever work. Honestly I'd just say Delete unless the nominator can articulate what makes these games special.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
07:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Populated places disestablished in New Brunswick in 2023
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection between specific ethnicity and specific political orientation, per egrs
Mason (
talk)
00:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.