The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories have to be defining. If character categories do not fit in the new categories, perhaps they should be removed from the new categories, which should only contain examples of fiction, not the characters therein. After all, they are members of "fiction by topic", and there's a separate parent category "elements of fiction".
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
05:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Rename if it is not significant enough to the work to justifiy the target names, it is not significant enough to categorize by. We should not be categorizing by every scene in a movie, only ones that define the work as a whole.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
19:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Water transport in fiction
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: What fiction defined by being about water transport would not qualify as nautical fiction? Since there is a full overlap, this category should be combined with the defining one, if there is anything to combine.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
21:11, 9 July 2022 (UTC)reply
There were two articles in the nominated category but I moved them to subcategories. I guess that makes the question moot, there are no longer articles to be categorized individually.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
16:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Family in fiction
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support in principle as a category name phrased more clearly as based on a defining characteristic. The category should also be containerized, otherwise almost every article about fiction might be added.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
05:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment Not sure about this change, families can be in fiction (in fact, families figure somewhat in many books of fiction) without being ABOUT those families. But "Family in fiction" seems too broad to be useful as a category. LizRead!Talk!20:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Origami in fiction
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: "Fiction that uses blood as a plot element" is not defining, nor is it likely that it can be made so by renaming this category. As something that is intrinsically not defining for works of fiction, this category should be deleted.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
11:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.