The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete/containerize, generally not a defining characteristic. The US subcategories may be an exception, for now they have not been included in the nomination.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
05:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment just to pick Chicago. We have 54 articles in the mayors category. 2 in the spouses of the mayor category. One of those was a journalist who would be categorized enough as such. I am not seeing a justification for this tree at all, and am thinking in some cases it might be used to imply people are notable who are not.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
19:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.