Category:Grammy Award winners for Album of the Year
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support for consistency, although I'm not sure if the name of the new category (= the current name of the current category) is distinct enough from the proposed name of the current category. But further discussion about that may take place in a fresh discussion.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
05:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Voting lobby groups
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Peak body organisations
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Peak body is an Australian term for what is generally called a Lobbying organization in other places. As a category title it's inconsistent and a bit confusing.
Rathfelder (
talk)
20:22, 8 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Socialist economists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, trivial intersection between educational background (economist) and political conviction (socialist). Note by the way that this reasoning does not apply to the subcategory because
Marxian economics concerns an economics school of thought rather than a political conviction.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
06:09, 8 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose I could see a hypothetical biography where someone went to school and majored in economics and then went on to be a socialist political activist. But then I read through the articles:
Michael Albert actually majored in physics but has been a socialist cooperative economist,
John Roemer writes about distributive justice, and
Sidney Webb, 1st Baron Passfield writes about how nationalization will end poverty.
RevelationDirect (
talk)
10:23, 8 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Inclined to keep -- Being a socialist is a strong indication of the approach that socialist economists take to their subject (likewise Marxist economists). The intersection in this case is anything but trivial. Economics is a social science, not a science, and one where a person's political point of view very much reflects how they seal with it.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
17:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Inclined to keep as well. Marxian economics may be the dominant school of thought within Western socialist economics after Marx, but Marx and Engels themselves as well as several pre-Marxian socialists, Christian socialists or social anarchists were socialist economists, yet no Marxians. --
PanchoS (
talk)
07:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)reply
keep nomination shows a false understanding of this category. Being a 'socialist economist' is certainly defining and different from the run of the mill capitalist economists
Hmains (
talk)
02:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Christianity of the Middle Ages
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment our main article on the period is at
Middle Ages not
Medieval Period, not that such a choice binds us, but may be of instruction. I don't like "Medieval Religion" formulations as it seems to have a connotation that the religion of that period differs from that religion of today - rather than just groups articles having to do with that religion during that period. Of course, some religious practices have changed, but some would argue the religion, per se, has not. Maybe I'm reading too much into the wording?
Carlossuarez46 (
talk)
18:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Option B -- The earlier part of the main article is about the post-Roman, which is probably a sibling for Late Antique Christianity, as late antique tends to refer to the continuing Eastern Empire.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
17:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Option A or D or F (=RevelationDirect's variant), i.e. Christianity in/of/during the Middle Ages, per comments of Carlossuarez (avoid medieval religion) and Johnbod (avoid history of), and have this discussion followed up by an RM for the article.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
07:28, 11 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete -- The category has no scope for expansion. The one article will serve very well as a main article for the subcategory. I might have said upmerge, but I do not think that would add anything useful.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
17:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.