Category:American adult animated television programs featuring anthropomorphic characters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:American LGBT drama television series
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Consensus for this tree is that television series should be categorized as "LGBT-related" rather than "LGBT". For an example of why this is necessary, this seems to have been getting weirdly misused as a point of separation between American drama series which centre on LGBT characters as in Queer as Folk and The L Word, which were getting filed here, and American drama series which have LGBT supporting characters as secondary aspects of the show as in Sex and the City and Melrose Place, which were being left in the parent ‹The
templateCategory link is being
considered for merging.›Category:LGBT-related drama television series instead. But that's not the distinction we want this category tree to reflect -- all American shows that are LGBT-related enough to warrant categorization on this characteristic at all belong together, not separated into distinct "LGBT" vs. "LGBT-related" buckets on the question of whether the LGBT content was a primary or secondary theme.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:34, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mittelbau-Dora
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Famous foreign Bollywood singers and dancers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete - I doubt if the words 'famous' or 'foreign' occur in any category names that have survived cfd.
Oculi (
talk)
Delete. There are so many things wrong with this: we do not use the category system to distinguish notable practitioners of the same occupation into distinct "famous" vs. "not-famous" camps above and beyond the basic question of whether they're notable enough to be on Wikipedia at all; we don't yoke singers and dancers together in the same category as each other, but rather apply each occupation as distinct categories; we don't use the category system to mark people out as "foreign" above and beyond the basic matter of categorizing people by their actual nationality. Literally the only part of this that isn't a total non-starter is "Bollywood", and we already have categories for that.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:32, 29 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Medical schools in Pakistan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: At
CFD August 13 there was a narrow consensus to use "medical colleges" in the name of the regional sub-category, following local usage. This should apply nationally. Note: If this is approved, it will override any future C2C nomination to revert to the usual "medical schools" (see
Category:Medical schools by country).
Note 1: The current name follows the name of the article
Medical school. There is a separate article
Medical college which is about trade associations for doctors.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of comics by Marvel Comics
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
A late reply to @
Fayenatic london: you are right that we cannot rename this is isolation. The rename that I proposed earlier (with "publications") should be applied to other members of the tree as well. If that would require an entirely fresh nomination, so be it.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
06:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:National Heroes of Barbados
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
In 1998, Barbados celebrated a centenary and created a top ten list (there's literally 10) of influential figures from Barbados' history. Other than sainthood, awards given out decades after a person's death are rarely defining and this category is already
listified here.
RevelationDirect (
talk)
00:37, 14 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep OCAWARD has an exception for the most notable ones, particularly Nobel laureates. This is the state's selection of 10, not that of a random person. We have been deleting national awards given to foreign dignitaries for diplomatic reasons and those given to 1000s of people, but this is different. There is no possibility of expansion.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
17:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.