The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Headmasters of The Hill School
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Roman Egypt
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge as follow-up on
this earlier discussion where a reverse merge was nominated. Assuming that nobody wants to keep the Egypt and Roman Egypt categories in parallel for these centuries, and since the previous nomination was opposed, this new nomination should normally be endorsed.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
15:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Reverse merge -- There is no essential difference between Hellenic (or Ptolemaic) Egypt, Roman Egypt and later Egypt. There was no non-Roman Egypt to require disambiguating. The core has been essentially intact for 5000 years, though the outer imperial boundaries have fluctuated between periods.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
21:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Support per rationale of nom and the majority of those who participated in the previous discussion. It's now fairly well settled policy that we avoid ahistorical naming.
Laurel Lodged (
talk)
17:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Urban, rural, regional, real estate, and transportation economics
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete per
WP:OVERLAPCAT and precedents for JEL code categories.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The terms pontifical commissions and pontifical councils are not proper nouns and should not be capitalized (in contrast to specific pontifical commissions and pontifical councils, e.g., Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity). This would bring the capitalization into line with the main article in each category.
142.160.131.202 (
talk)
04:43, 30 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Law of the Jungle (TV series) participants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Ancient year and decade categories in Egypt, France, Germany, India and the Maya civilization
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge according to Option B. Although the support for option B in this discussion is marginal, it makes sense to close this consistently with other recent CFD closures. –
FayenaticLondon21:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: merge to century categories per country per
WP:SMALLCAT, nearly all these categories have only one article without a reasonable chance of expansion.
Note 1: on the
talk page there is a list of container categories that naturally become empty if this merge is accepted. Though they haven't been tagged, it would be helpful if they are deleted upon closing this discussion.
Support. However, we should consider putting the Egypt articles into Asia also; they're all related to the Ptolemaic Dynasty, which often controlled the southern parts of the Fertile Crescent. In the same way, if there are earlier categories, a future nomination should be careful, since the power of the Egyptian empire under certain kings of the New Kingdom, e.g.
Thutmose III, was projected well to the north in the Fertile Crescent, so such categories might also have Asian items.
Nyttend (
talk)
11:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Support generally but I am not sure the continental categories are useful and would merge direct to the year category. The Maya have good dating, but I think this is unique in America. Egypt has good dating, but that is probably unique in Africa. This also avoids the objection as to the need for an Asian target.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
11:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)reply
It is indeed likely that won't even have enough content by continent by year to make a continent split. But let's first see how the country mergers turn out before turning to the next layer of categorization.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
21:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Personally I'm no great fan of continent categories, apart from eg (association) football, where continental confederations are the main unit of organisation. But continental categories imply a X by continent parent category, which even if you count 7 continents is pretty much a classic
WP:SMALLCAT. Personally I'd nuke the continent layer before say 1500 and let the Egyptians and Maya mingle.
Le Deluge (
talk)
14:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Perhaps I've been too conservative in the nomination, as I don't have any specific objections against merging to global year categories.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
18:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: to give Option B a chance
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
FayenaticLondon23:20, 29 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Support all (B) as a good first step. Let's see the shape of it thereafter. More upmerges may be necessary. 1500AD as a cut-off point is a tad too Euro-centric.
Laurel Lodged (
talk)
09:32, 30 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Option A per nom: "But let's first see how the country mergers turn out before turning to the next layer of categorization." The present set-up is well-organised and coherent (but sparsely populated), and cfd can tend to leave a mess behind (by dismantling part of a category tree and moving on, leaving roots and branches disconnected).
Oculi (
talk)
10:43, 30 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.