The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Medieval law
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: upmerge per
WP:SMALLCAT, nearly all categories contain only one article and it's quite unlikely these categories will be populated any better. Some notes:
A number of categories don't need a double upmerge to a Law-by-century category because their article is already in a Treaties-by-century subcat (see bottom half of the category list).
This nomination ends in 1200, thereafter it makes more sense to categorize by decade instead of century, just like already happens in the Treaties subcat tree.
Support -- I do not think treaties ought generally to be in a law tree. I doubtwe will ever find enough law to merit anything less than century categories.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
17:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.