- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Speedy Delete per G7 - Author requested deletion below. VegaDark ( talk) 09:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Per
Category:Musicians by band, "categories should not be created when only one member has an article." Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me
21:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- You can go ahead to delete it. When I first created it more than one of the Gugudan members had an article and they were all in the category. It isn't the case anymore. Alicia leo86 ( talk) 06:55, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
Good Ol’factory
(talk)
23:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Time series databases to Category:Time series software
- Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, currently only an eponymous and one article. When merging, the eponymous article should also be moved to Category:Types of databases. Marcocapelle ( talk) 13:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support No conceptual objection to this breakdown but it serves no navigational purpose with just one article. RevelationDirect ( talk) 11:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge.
Good Ol’factory
(talk)
23:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Long-memory processes to Category:Autocorrelation
- Nominator's rationale: upmerge, specialist topic with only few articles, while an article Long-memory processes does not exist. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename, without prejudice to a future proposal to delete/merge it as proposed by a user below.
Good Ol’factory
(talk)
23:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Kommunist class of cargo ships to Category:Kommunist-class cargo ships
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NCSHIP. Mark Schierbecker ( talk) 10:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Rename per C2B. VegaDark ( talk) 07:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Upmerge to all parent categories per WP:SMALLCAT. There is currently only one article in it. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure). Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Nothing is written in the literature about this supposed musical genre. Binksternet ( talk) 03:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure). Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: This supposed musical genre doesn't have anything written about in the music literature. It appears to be a hoax. The page is attempting to be a category and a mainspace article. Binksternet ( talk) 03:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Per WP:G6, deleting pages unambiguously created in error or in the incorrect namespace. I'll defer to others as to whether this article should exist, but it is clearly not a category at all. RevelationDirect ( talk) 11:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.