The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
delete What actually make a youth hostel notable? Well, apparently nothing that's about being a hostel. By my rough survey half of the membership are listed buildings currently used all or in part for a hostel, and the other half are towns which happen to have a youth hostel among their amenities. I'm sorry, but I don't see how this adds up to a category of hostels; with the one odd Canadian example excepted, there aren't articles on buildings because they are hostels (which I think is quite reasonable), and there's certainly no reason to list towns as if they were hostels.
Seyasirt (
talk)
01:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Support rename -- As we have articles on a number of youth hostels, we should retain a category. If the category is being misused by categorising places with a youth hostel, which is not discussed in the article, the solution is to purge, not delete.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
16:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Even if an article mentions a youth hostel doesn't mean it should be in a category such as this one. For example,
Pen-y-Pass (which I've just removed from this category) is about a mountain pass; things that are (or have been in the past) at that place include hotel, youth hostel, cafe, car park, bus stop etc - the article doesn't belong in categories for those things. If we had any articles actually about individual youth hostels (e.g.
Pen-y-Pass Youth Hostel) then they would belong in a category such as this. DexDor(talk)06:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Support rename per Peterkingiron. The category has been purged meanwhile and the remaining articles really are about buildings in use as a youth hostel.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
22:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Slovenian pentathletes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Slovenia declared its independence in 1991. The
women's pentathlon ceased to be an international standard event in 1981. This anachronistic category isn't one that warrants creation and its sole child subject hadn't competed in a pentathlon for almost 30 years by the time of the nation's creation.
SFB20:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Natural sites in Aarhus
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The usual Wiki category for natural features in Foo is "Geography of Foo". "Natural sites in Foo" is only used in 2 instances (see below).
Bermicourt (
talk)
19:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Upmerge to
Category:Visitor attractions in Aarhus. While I agree with rationale of nominator, a similar reasoning applies to the proposed rename: no other Danish cities have a "Geography of city" child category, so this rename doesn't seem to be appropriate either. Visitor attractions on the other hand is a well-established category form for (Danish) cities.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
23:05, 21 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Natural sites in Denmark
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Organizations based in Mongolia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Note: I already implemented the merger for Ulaanbaatar, as the S spelling is a newly created duplicate; there was already a longstanding category, spelled with Z; finding the latter empty, I renamed it from Ulan Bator to Ulaanbaatar as housekeeping after speedy renaming of
Category:Ulaanbaatar. –
FayenaticLondon18:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose. C2C states "This criterion should only be applied when there is no ambiguity or doubt over the existence of a category naming convention. Such a convention must be well defined and must be overwhelmingly used within the tree. If this is not the case then the category in question must be brought forward to a full Cfd nomination."
Category:Non-profit organisations based in Mongolia also exists.
WP:STRONGNAT does not apply
AusLondonder (
talk)
22:48, 9 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Question Does Mongolia tend to use one regional version of English over another? If not, I have no objection to making things consistent with the "z" as proposed above. (I'm also not adverse to changing the parent category.)
RevelationDirect (
talk)
02:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:20th-century Armenian male actores
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:speedy renamed by
User:Lugnuts as a straight spelling error which didn't actually require debate. The misspelled version can be deleted as an implausible redirect since it's a spelling error that's unlikely to be repeated by too many users.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete redirect after the category itself has already been renamed manually. Not the best thing from a procedural point of view, but the outcome is obvious.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
20:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)reply
A straight spelling error like this can just be fixed by anyone at any time, or listed for CFR-speedy if necessary, and doesn't actually have to come all the way to CFD for seven full days of debate. The renaming's already been done by another editor, so there's no need to keep this open any further.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Ancient peoples of Assam
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Upmerge I expected this to be about ethnic groups that ceased to exist before 1500 or maybe an earlier cut off, but it is not. Probably due to the creator having limited proficiency in English. Still the contents clearly belong in the target pointed out by RevelationDirect. I do not think an arbitrary year division is justified at this time. If we were to divide, 1827 when Assam became part of the British Raj would be far better than 1800 which has no significance to Assam.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
17:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Diseases with moribund eradication efforts
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Household brands
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete, as overly subjective. "Common household brands" may well vary from one culture to another. Also, touting a product line as a 'household brand' is POV and promotional. –
Gilliam (
talk)
05:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Energy art
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. The definition of the category is unknown. The selection criteria for this category are unknown. This term is not commonly used in the literature. A search of Google Books and Google Scholar provided no hits that connect "Energy Art" with two of the members of this category (Burning Man or Survival Research Laboratories). A search of the web shows that "Energy Art" seems to be used with visualizing energy, which is very different from Burning Man or Survival Research Laboratories. The "Energy Art" page was
deleted in 2012. Full Disclosure: I've been to Burning Man, but not since 2012. I've worked with Survival Research Laboratories. Original research: I've never heard Mark Pauline or anyone associated with Survival Research Laboratories use the term "Energy art".
Cxbrx (
talk)
04:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.