The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This category is entirely based on original research and not supported by reliable sources. —Farix (
t |
c)
22:42, 21 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment the genre does seem to have quite a history, influencing violent, gory Japanese films from 1960s onwards
[1]. I'm not knowledgeable enough to know whether such a classification is workable though.
SFB18:58, 22 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Far Eastern Games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: I have recently moved the article base from the former
Far Eastern Games title as most of the sources show the official and common name to be "Far Eastern Championship Games" from 1915 onwards.
SFB21:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Individual bulls
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: A step too far. "Individual cattle" is plenty sufficient. The six members of this category are also in supercategory "individual cattle" which they shouldn't be in both. "Individual cattle" has 24 members including the six in this category. "Individual cattle" is plenty unique enough to categorize these entities, we don't need "Individual cattle named Dave" and so forth.
Herostratus (
talk)
17:57, 21 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. I've re-populated the category, so we can see what we're dealing with. After doing this, there were 12 articles in it. Let's hope they don't get removed again while this discussion is ongoing.
Good Ol’factory(talk)09:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)reply
keep of course, those bulls having their own name are special enough to have their own category. Even fictional bulls belong here. Members of this category need to be removed from the higher level parent categories.
Hmains (
talk)
06:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - the usage of the English language (having completely different names for the males and females) is a good enough reasojn, assuming there's population for the category - and 12 is enough.
עוד מישהוOd Mishehu22:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Upmerge Where there is content, the subject's being a bull doesn't seem to improve the relatedness of the content. In there we have fighting bulls, cloned bulls, breeding bulls, record bulls, and sacred bulls – we have cow variants of those concepts in the cattle parent that are now divorced from that content. The gender of the animal simply isn't helpful to navigation and if we do diffuse it should be by theme (fighting bulls etc.) instead.
SFB02:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2014 half marathons
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Documentary films about the Gallipoli Campaign
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary subcategorization. Only has one entry. The mother category has 4. At this point this category isn't needed.
...William16:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Barrages
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support Logic of change matches up with usage and description of topics (i.e. Barrage as a type of dam, tidal barrages as a type of barrage).
SFB16:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Support barrages are also not restricted to civil engineering, artillery barrages exist in military topics, and stuff like barrage balloons for anti-barrage equipment --
67.70.35.44 (
talk)
06:40, 24 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional transgender and transsexual characters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: 'Trans' basically covers the extent of the categories. For characters that are merely cross-dressers, the category name as-is doesn't cover them, either.
Negative Hippie (
talk)
14:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The text accomplishes that, though. Further, as I said, the description does not cover every article that is in the category. Further yet, the fact that the word transsexual is offensive to some could be potentially problematic, whereas the use of the word trans to cover characters identified as being a transvestite, transsexual, or transgender works. -
Negative Hippie (
talk)
20:42, 21 December 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Negative Hippie: I'm not really aware of transexual being an offensive term. Looking at
this source it appears that some people simply do not relate to the term, preferring transgender. This is different from offence and not problematic in the current usage given the presence of both terms. The given source also advises against out of context use of "trans" on the grounds it may not be easily understood, which I agree with.
SFB01:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Romanian mountain resorts
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Also, there is actually a page in the category now, so I think this category should not be deleted but expanded apon by some user.
Gug01 (
talk)
16:30, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Gug 01reply
Support since in Europe mountain resorts coincide too much with ski areas and resorts anyway. I've compared it with the resorts categories in Austria and Germany and they only offer ski areas and resorts, spa resorts and sea resorts as three possible resort alternatives, but not mountain resorts. By the way, I would not oppose renaming ski areas and resorts into mountain resorts for all countries, though that should require a separate nomination.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
13:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.