The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment Do you still think you can do that Vegaswikian? Because I'm still having a hard time moving all the images from
Porter County, Indiana to the commons. First because I found more of them, and second because whoever is in charge of deleting duplicates seems to be taking their time doing so. Apparently there's more of a backlog of duplicates of images in the commons than anybody expects. ----
DanTD (
talk)
04:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)reply
The fact that there is a backlog is not a reason to not take the correct action. Which images need deleting? I'll look and see what I can do.
Vegaswikian (
talk)
20:37, 15 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Slightly OT, if it's not too much trouble, there are also some duplicate images from Long Island, Westchester, Rockland, and Orange Counties in New York that could be deleted too. ----
DanTD (
talk)
22:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)reply
I don't know what assist tool gets rid of duplicates. I already moved the three I mentioned to the commons, plus there are those that are in the New York categories, which I didn't specify that I've moved as well. Starting now, though, while I may tag more images for the commons, I'm not adding them there, until the others are deleted. ----
DanTD (
talk)
05:44, 19 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Category:Images of Jeffersonville, Indiana. If downtown Jeffersonville indeed is a "general area, not a formally recognized district" (
choster; 23:51, 11 February 2011), then we should not have a category for an area whose boundaries are not formally established. In addition, we do not have enough content (articles or media) about Jeffersonville to necessitate this type of split; for instance, merging the categories will result in a category with only 43 member pages. -- Black Falcon(
talk)20:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Computational models
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Steam locomotives of Russia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Weak Keep, perhaps reverse merge. It's a little unclear but the category contains at least two classes that predate the Bolsheviks.
Mangoe (
talk)
15:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Doh! sorry I didn't think if that - ie pre 1917 russia. It's not clear what to do no but I think I should remove the delete request. Thanks/
Sf5xeplus (
talk)
00:02, 12 February 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Ocean basins
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Rename. Rename to match the main article,
oceanic basin. In reading that article, it appears that an ocean basin is something else, so recreation should be allowed if needed.
Vegaswikian (
talk)
23:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Jyllands-Posten cartoons controversy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.