The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename per nom. As the creator of these cats I support the re-naming. Perhaps the article ahould be moved to Schola Contorum de Paris as well?
4meter4 (
talk)
14:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People by city district or neighborhood
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep as an appropriate means of organizing such categories as a parent. Its existence does not mean that all neighborhoods in all localities will be categorized, but for those that do merit categorization this is an appropriate parent.
Alansohn (
talk)
04:39, 27 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People by city by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. the subcats were not included in this nomination, and are being kept per this nomination, however, this doesn't create any prejudice against a nomination of them.
Courcelles (
talk)
00:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete—at least on principle. We may need the category to keep track of its contents while we go about nominating them for deletion. But it should at least eventually be deleted.--
Mike Selinker (
talk)
15:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete, given that this iniative includes a few more contributors than before, as maintaining not having this tree will take some vigilance. So actors and sportspeople are out but musicians and politicians are in, I guess. What about local tv personalities, probably in too because they contribute directly to the local culture. I don t know if I (will) agree that U.S. states and their equivalents should not have generally divided occupation cats.
Mayumashu (
talk)
01:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I'm cool with politicians (direct contribution) and radio personalities (programming for area). I'd probably take out musicians, but the concept of a "scene" might mitigate that.--
Mike Selinker (
talk)
02:20, 25 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Albums by genre and record label
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Numb3rs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Rename - with the exception of the article on the series itself, the contents are all episode articles. I don't see any need for a category named after the series so renaming this one to reflect its contents is probably the easiest solution.
Are You The Cow Of Pain? (
talk)
01:24, 24 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I concur with TCOP - Numb3rs is nothing more than the correct spelling of the show's name. So rename per nom (and keep the main article in the renamed cat, using the sort key to display it at the top of the page).
Cgingold (
talk)
01:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Charter 77
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Strong keep unless we are in the business of eviscerating history, all human endeavour, and all those who took a stand in order to change the state of things.
AllyD (
talk)
22:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)reply
It seems to me that in cases like this -- and there are many, usually for "members of" sub-cats -- the main article should be placed in that sub-category, using the sort key to display it at the top of the page, separate from the members/signatories. And yes, Delete.
Cgingold (
talk)
01:44, 25 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Merge with
Category:Charter 77 signatories (or vice versa). Charter 77 was extremely significant in its time, but it is unlikely to have more than one article, so that the existence of a category cannot be justified. That article could usefully be made the main article for the signatories category.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
15:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Charter 08
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete both - absolutely no need for a category to hold the single article
Charter 08. The signatories subcat seems unnecessary as well. There are only a
very few "signers of..." categories and categories for signers of documents like this one have been deleted in the past. Signing this particular document doesn't appear to be the sort of achievement that warrants a category.
Are You The Cow Of Pain? (
talk)
00:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Procedural Keep of
Category:Charter 08 signatories - Were you aware that both of these were taken to CFD in January and Kept? While I basically share your sentiments as to the merits of the categories, I really hate to see repeat CFDs this close together. Category creator notified using {{cfd-notify}}Cgingold (
talk)
02:52, 24 July 2010 (UTC)reply
No, I wasn't aware of that. However, six months isn't a completely unreasonable margin between CFDs, especially ones which didn't draw a lot of attention. Would you agree that regardless of when it was last nominated there's no need for a category to hold nothing but the article and its signatories category, which has little or no chance of ever expanding?
Are You The Cow Of Pain? (
talk)
03:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I just read thru your question again and I'm wondering, are you suggesting that we delete
Category:Charter 08 now -- but hold off on the other cat for a later CFD? That might be a reasonable thing to do.
Cgingold (
talk)
07:53, 24 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep the signatories one: I have a suspicion that this is a big deal in China. There is
Category:Charter 77 which should probably be considered at the same time. (Was there a cfd about scientists who signed something about climate change?) I don't see that
Category:Charter 08 itself is serving any useful purpose.
Occuli (
talk)
09:47, 24 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.