Category:Accessories awards
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete, no opposition.
Kbdank71
13:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Accessories awards (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Delete without prejudice because it is unnecessarily specific at this point. Currently there is one entry in "Accessories awards", and that article is also categorized in the parent category, "Fashion awards", which has only 12 articles and need not be split at this point.
lquilter
16:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Note, since nobody is picking up on this maybe there's some confusion. This category is dealing with fashion accessories. So it could easily be upmerged into parent category Fashion awards. --
lquilter
17:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename.
Kbdank71
13:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Propose renaming
Category:Geology prizes to
Category:Geology awards
- Nominator's rationale: Rename - Almost all other science awards are in form of "Subject awards", and not all geology awards are prizes per se. (Some are medals, some lectures, some honorary titles, etc.)
lquilter
16:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Economics prizes, medals, and awards
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename.
Kbdank71
13:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Propose renaming
Category:Economics prizes, medals, and awards to
Category:Economics awards
- Nominator's rationale: Rename, Propose renaming "Economics prizes, medals, and awards" in keeping with the vast majority of other subject-based awards in "Subject awards" format. This is also in keeping with earlier discussions that consolidated
Category:Prizes into
Category:Awards, choosing "awards" as the broader and more generic term for all of those synonymous recognitions. (Either or both medals or prizes often accompany awards, as well as honorary lectures, etc.)
lquilter
16:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:My Gym Partner's a Monkey
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Kbdank71
13:29, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:My Gym Partner's a Monkey (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Delete - eponymous overcategorization for a series. Material doesn't warrant the category.
Otto4711
14:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Kbdank71
13:29, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Wonder Pets (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Delete - eponymous overcategorization for a TV show. Not warranted for the show article and a random character article.
Otto4711
14:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Kbdank71
13:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:The X's (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Delete - category not needed for just the show article.
Otto4711
14:29, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Guests on The Colbert Report
Category:Later punk groups
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was relisted on oct 26.
Kbdank71
13:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Later punk groups (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Subjective classification - how exactly is this defined? What is later, or indeed earlier for that matter?
Lugnuts
10:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Vaníček analysis
Category:America's Next Top Model participants
Category:Sports Illustrated swimsuit models