The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!"
13:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Ohio Bishops (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete. At a minimum, current name is miscapitalized and unclear. Based on parentage, this category appears to be for bishops from Ohio. However, some articles in it aren't from Ohio, they were bishops of areas that are in Ohio. I don't see the need to classify bishops by the state they are from (altho if so, this ought to be renamed to
Category:Bishops from Ohio for clarity), and bishops by the state that their diocese/synod is in doesn't seem like a good idea, given that many of those overlap state boundaries, and
Category:Bishops by diocese already exists and is more precise.
Mairi
00:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:2015 games to Category:2015, Inc. games
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 16:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Adam Carolla (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete,
Wikipedia:Categorization of people states that "In certain very notable cases, people are being categorized by the name of the person itself, for example Category:Abraham Lincoln.". Adam Carolla may be notable but I don't think he is "a very notable case."
Gdo01
22:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. Mairi 05:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Art Fair (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, Category created only for one article which has 'art fair' in the article name. The
Category:Art exhibitions should be the main cat.
Clubmarx
22:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 16:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:TV Blackjack to Category:Blackjack television programs
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 16:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Xena Warrior Princess episodes (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, underpopulated category with seemingly little prospect of being populated. If not deleted then Rename to
Category:Xena: Warrior Princess episodes for correct punctuation of the show title.
Otto4711
21:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!"
13:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Just a repeat of Category:Cuban baseball players
Alex
21:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional goths (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Not defining characteristic. Character inclusion is debatable. Is goth just a fashion or does it go with behaviour? It is problematically categorised under fictional characters by belief. Its existence sets precedent for
Category:Fictional characters by fashion/social clique/whatever. ~
Zythe
Talk to me!
20:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. It is five-four in favour of delete, and the "keep" arguments do not convince me. We are discussing fictional characters here. If the gender-neutrality guideline applies to fictional characters, then, to quote it, "You must be able to write a substantial and encyclopedic head article (not just a list) for the category — if this cannot be done, then the category is not valid." I will reconsider my decision if someone convinces me of the need for a well-sourced, encyclopedic article at Fictional female super-villan. -- RobertG ♬ talk 14:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Female super-villains (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
You should not separate fictional characters by gender, and precedent set at fictional demonesses and similar categories. ~
Zythe
Talk to me!
20:14, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. -- RobertG ♬ talk 14:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply
correct case to match other categories— Chidom talk 17:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was category was empty, delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 14:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 15:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Art portals to Category:Arts portals
The result of the debate was rename. While the article name has been debated, and there is a section about the controversy in the article, there has been no formal request for its renaming. If and when the article is renamed, a nomination to rename the categories accordingly should not meet with much resistance. -- RobertG ♬ talk 15:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:War of Independence of 1857 to
Category:Indian Rebellion of 1857
Category:Battles of the Indian Mutiny to
Category:Battles of the Indian Rebellion of 1857
The result of the debate was merge. -- RobertG ♬ talk 15:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Rajasthani Indian independence activists into both Category:Indian independence activists and Category:People from Rajasthan
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!"
12:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category has become so overbroad as to be useless. No clear reason to distinguish between heroines and heroes, and no clear definition of heroine is in place - it appears to include any sympathetic female character to appear in the credits of a science fiction or fantasy television show, for instance. The judgment of heroine thus becomes POV (Is Cordelia Chase a heroine, or a supporting character? Is Hot Lips from M*A*S*H* a heroine?) beyond the point of usefulness. The bulk of the entries are superheroines - these characters should be spun off into a superheroines category that compliments the existing superheroes. (As gender distinctions in comics are a very, very active and important issue - see
Women in Refrigerators and the work of Trina Robbins for examples of commentary that indicates the significance of a gender divide.)
Phil Sandifer
16:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 16:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Stephen Colbert (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, I know that Colbert has become quite the phenomenon but this category is an obvious cruft category with no purpose other than to unify all of the shows Colbert has been on (even those he hardly had any part in). This could be better shown on a list or table within the Colbert article not a category.
Gdo01
14:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was category was empty: delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 15:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Mairi 05:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Jigsaw's first three victims (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Only three articles, two of which I've nominated for deletion.
CyberGhostface
13:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!"
13:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Originally nominated for speedy renaming to
Category:Chilean human rights victims by
Bearcat at 07:01 on 16 November 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus. Sorry, everyone: there's a backlog of CFDs and to reduce pressure here slightly I have started a more wide-ranging discussion here about this matter. The aim is to get the obviously desirable widespread support for conventions that can hereafter become guidelines, and be added as acceptable criteria for speedy category renames. The change suggested in this CFD discussion and the others mentioned seems to me to require so many categories to change that this consensus, and the previous ones linked to below, are not sufficiently well supported to be implemented. If there had been unanimous agreement for "XY novels" I would have implemented it. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Some of these follow one convention, e.g.:
And some of them follow another convention, e.g.:
And some of them are completely different, e.g. :
I don't care which naming convention is used as long as they all follow the same pattern in the end, so let's decide something. — freak( talk) 13:39, Nov. 18, 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus, but there is significant support for making a list.
the wub
"?!"
17:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Blue plaques (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Buildings with blue plaques (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:People commemorated by blue plaques (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!"
13:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Comic strip formats
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
17:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Maltese actors by medium into
Category:Maltese actors
The result of the debate was no consensus. I have read over the arguments made here, finding merit on both sides, and I cannot find a consensus to delete, neither do I hear an unqualified "keep". The category will no doubt attract articles about acts whose status as "state terrorism" is either unsubstantiated or controversial; from this point the best outcome is for interested Wikipedians to ensure that only articles that incontrovertibly belong under the category title are included. I urge fellow Wikipedians to remember that the category's title is "state terrorism", and not the subtly different and possibly pov "acts of state terrorism". -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:State terrorism (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This category is inherently POV. This category was deleted about a year ago for the same reason (
discussion). It was recreated about half a year ago. As it has been around for a while and contains quite some articles, I think it wouldn't be proper to speedily delete the category under
WP:CSD#G4, but I do think it should be deleted.
Jitse Niesen (
talk)
03:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:L'Engle Characters to Category:Characters from Madeleine L'Engle works
The result of the debate was I'll relist here in the hope of generating further discussion. -- RobertG ♬ talk 16:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Unofficial golf tournaments to Category:Unofficial money golf tournaments