< January 21 | January 23 > |
---|
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Democratic peace theory -- Kbdank71 15:08, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
This really should be a speedy, but that has been objected to, on the grounds that the related article Democratic peace theory is and has been controversial. The article is, but its name is not in dispute; and the cat, which is quite new, really ought to follow it and standard cat conventions. Septentrionalis 21:28, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
An adjective is an odd title for a category when we have a perfectly good name to use for it. Note that Category:Jesuits, the common name, is already in use for members of the order. Necrothesp 20:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Was a speedy to change U.S. to United States. Objections raised so bringing it here. Vegaswikian 20:24, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to category:American politicians by state -- Kbdank71 15:01, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Was a speedy to change U.S. to United States. Objections raised so bringing it here. Vegaswikian 20:24, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Standard lower-case. Standard naming convention. Mais oui! 18:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Only contained two items, and is basically overlapping with mycology anyway. Stemonitis 14:23, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
This category contained a single entry ( List of mycological journals), and since that list only includes two items, the category seems doomed to smallness. Stemonitis 14:23, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Duplicate. Merge CalJW 14:17, 22 January 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
These categories are named in American English, and are quite wrong in Commonwealth English, where post secondary institutions are never referred to as schools. They need new names which will be clear to everyone.
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Should be "Wikipedia rejected proposals". R adiant _>|< 13:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Another redundant and hardly-used categorization of Wikipedia pages. R adiant _>|< 11:48, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete, silly. R adiant _>|< 11:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
All subcats are on CFD, delete. R adiant _>|< 11:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:43, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Not encyclopedic, covers too many characters to be even remotely useful. -- MisterHand 08:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename to match siblings in Category:Buildings and structures in New York City. Choalbaton 06:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was both cats are redlinks at time of closing, no action taken. Syrthiss 13:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
To change the U.S. to United States. Also, all of the subcats for this category have the same form and should also be changed. Don't know if they all need a template of if it can be done from this one nomination. Vegaswikian 05:32, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Syrthiss 13:30, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Recently created and Category:Geography of Hawaii already exists. JonHarder 04:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
This also helps ensure consistency with main article's Hawaiian Islands title.
Bob_Burkhart
Lenexa
Kansas
RJBurkhart
12:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete with large fire from orbit. Syrthiss 13:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
1) For the sake of balance if Category:Wikipedians with tiny penises has been nominated. 2) On account of its ungrammatical construction - should be "well-endowed". 3) Issues relating to verifiability. Valiantis 04:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep. Syrthiss 13:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Overcategorisation. See my comments re: Category:English Egyptologists below. The Scottishness or Englishness of an Egyptologist is not central to his or her work, so the standard scheme of subcategorising by nationality defined by country should apply. Valiantis 04:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete with fire from orbit. Syrthiss 13:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikipedian categorization has become entirely too silly. (Not to mention that the proper name would presumably be "Wikipedians with a tiny penis"). — Kirill Lok s hin 03:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC) Delete with much laughter. Justin Eiler 04:00, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply