< December 31 | January 2 > |
---|
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Speady Delete Category:User Dyslexic it just redirects to Category:Dyslexic Wikipedians and has no incoming links. -- Pfafrich 22:06, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Essentially a duplicate of the parent Category:Curators. Adds little or nothing and creates inconsistency. Merge CalJW 21:56, 1 January 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The two dictionaries and one art guide I checked, spell avant-garde with a dash. New category is created and some articles moved. Too bold? Perhaps. Sparkit 21:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Superfluous category for identical subjects. DocJohnny 15:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Superfluous category for identical subjects. DocJohnny 15:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete - Izehar 20:48, 7 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Weird U.S. and Category:Weird U.S. things
Delete: Useless and repetive categories for subjects also seen in the book Weird U.S., for which very few articles exist MechBrowman 02:09, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Very small, unlikely to grow. We should not have categories for individual diseases unless extremely common. JFW | T@lk 04:17, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply