The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 13:34, 8 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Redundant with Category:Muslims or Category:Muslim Wikipedians. Only contains two userpages which also are in Category:Muslim Wikipedians. TimBentley (talk) 00:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was deleted already. Syrthiss 13:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC) reply
All five above cats are the work of User:Jcaragonv who appears to be on a mission to create empty and/or misnamed "ethnicity" cats of every conceivable combination - see several other entries from the last few days. I have only nominated those that are empty or those that are named in something that is not quite English to minimise debates about usefulness, but if this proposal is successful I am minded to list some more which have only one or two articles and are wilfully obscure. Valiantis 23:42, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 13:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Category for a hockey team that never skated...See Cincinnati Mighty Ducks for background. ccwaters 23:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 13:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The broader classification will allow for a greater range of styles to be represented. Dan, the CowMan 22:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 13:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Change to match other CVG categories. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 22:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge with Category:Kurdistan. 4 Merge votes, 6 delete votes, 1 keep. Merge chosen because in terms of creation and deletion of categories (i.e. actual admin intervention) there is no difference. The only practical difference is the items currently in Kurdish provinces will be in Kurdistan category. Anyone may remove any articles from that category afterwards if they disagree with them being there. Tim! 16:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC) reply
wikipedia is not a soapbox or a battleground. Hattusili 20:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Also it is not right to call the cities in turkey where people from variable ethnicities live as Kurdish cities.-- Hattusili 20:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
If I get it right, the entire process of tagging various localities®ions under
Category: Kurdish provinces and
Category: Kurdish cities had been initiated by a possible sockpuppet.
[1] --
Cretanforever
08:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Rename all - TexasAndroid 14:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC) reply
These set of categories has hardly got going, but it does have potential as there are Ancient Greek sites in 10+ modern countries. However, they need clearer names:
also
Carlossuarez46 18:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename Tim! 17:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename The term Afro-Mexican is more commonly used to refer to Mexicans with African ancestry. Some find the term "Black Mexican" offensive. --- Lancini87 20:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete Tim! 17:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Not sure what this category is for, but it contains only one article from user space. Conscious 18:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete Tim! 17:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Completely redundant to Category:High schools. Rory096 17:35, 30 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Merge - TexasAndroid 14:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Only three articles. Merge into the much larger category. Bhoeble 16:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename Tim! 16:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
There's been some movement in Mars cat names recently and this seems a sensible change as well. Mars nomenclature includes "valles" and "chasma(ta)". They naturally overlap and the category should include both. Marskell 15:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was relisted on May 4 Tim! 16:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
An article incorrectly created as a category. A similar article exists with the correct title Bahamas Democratic Movement. Delete Valentinian (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge Tim! 17:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
I mistakenly created Category:Nature-related lists when I really meant to elevate Category:Nature lists to be directly under Category:Lists (partly because Category:Nature isn't under anything but Category:Fundamental). But since the list should be of the form x-related lists anyway, this might as well be a merge. JeffW 04:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename/Merge/Delete as nominated. - TexasAndroid 14:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC) reply
These categories don't follow Wikipedia's usual style, and I see no value in trying to decide which of them are "modern".
I done a lot of category work, but I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this muddle before! CalJW 04:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete - TexasAndroid 14:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Typo. See category:Visitor attractions in Belgium Delete. CalJW 03:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC). reply