The result of the debate was Delete, although 'apathy' might be more appropriate given the number of comments. Matchups 02:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
There is another page, List of titles of works based on Shakespearean phrases, which is more comprehensive. Also, the List page is helpfully organized by play and could (but does not yet) provide additional context. Matchups 02:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. - TexasAndroid 16:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
First, the history of 9/11 as reported by most journalists, policy experts, government officials, historians, jurists and even the suspects themselves - all this in many countries - are not just an "official 9/11 story". This category creates the impression that it has been created (today) in order to promote the so called "conspiracy theories" and is very misleading. Second, the nuanced opinions of so many individuals can be better expressed in the text. Many of these individuals have opinions on various matters and some Wikipedia articles already have 4 or more lines of categories. Is the sky the limit of categorization? gidonb 01:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. - TexasAndroid 16:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
This category and all constituent categories have been replaced by Category:Ultralight aircraft, which better explains the content. All subcategories of this category should be deleted; renaming has already taken place. Ingoolemo talk 00:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. - TexasAndroid 16:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Title of category belligerent and biased, created by editor who has been noted in the past for deleting VfD tags on his vanity article and for POV edits. Only article contained is full of POV and original research.-- Folksong 23:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. - TexasAndroid 16:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not fit our established categorization scheme (song year and genre are categorize4d seperately, and we as a consensus use "hip hop" and not "rap"). Created by a newbie. -- FuriousFreddy 19:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Misspelled/redundant category. Author has explained mistake in an edit summary. Propose to delete. Nordby73 16:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensous. (No consensous on a rename, either) - TexasAndroid 16:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
"Hip hop singer" is a misnomer (this is a group of singers from other genres -- mostly R&B and reggae -- who frequently appear on hip-hop songs - which actually would include 70% of all R&B artists, making the selection of artists inherently POV) - and artists who hjappen to record hip hop music and other genres as well. A category like this will only seek to confuse readers, and provides little factual encyclopedic value. -- FuriousFreddy 16:27, 1 April 2006 (UTC) reply
How about we call it Category:Rapper-singers?-- Urthogie 11:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Keep and deal with the ambiguity by stating what can be included on the categories page as per User:Urthogie Pedant 17:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge to Category:Northern Irish people. - TexasAndroid 16:41, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename as per nom both to follow the adopted convention with places with similar naming challenges (see Category:People from Bosnia and Herzegovina and category:People of the Democratic Republic of the Congo) and due to prevalence for this naming over other possible ones as a google search reveals. A search for " "People of Northern Ireland" -wikipedia " gets 203,000 hits, whereas " "People from Northern Ireland" -wikipedia " gets 19,600 (of course the former includes all residents and not just British citizens with NI origins. i prefer the added flexibility - non-British citizens who have contributed to NI society should be included - but suspect a lot of users prefer to keep strict "nationality" requirements); " "Northern Ireland people" -wikipedia " gets 24,000 hits and " "Northern Irish people" gets 917 hits. i offer to nominate relevant sub-cat links should this nom go through. Mayumashu 08:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. - TexasAndroid 16:52, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
I couldn't find it, but I suspect there is some sort of policy against putting user pages into categories and that's the sole purpose of this category. In addition, the sole article in that category is one that was copied to a user page in order to save it from being deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 June 19. JeffW 05:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename all. - TexasAndroid 16:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The English speaking countries in Europe use "transport" and I believe that the other countries tend to use it too. Certainly the EU does and so do the governments of major European countries like France, Germany (nominated separately below and looking likely to go through at the moment) and Russia. The reason why most of the transport(ation) categories were created as "transportation in" is that most or all of the articles were created from CIA World Factbook data by an American user and his bot and the categories were made to match. Therefore rename category:Transportation in Europe to category:Transport in Europe. If this looks like going through I will tag the subcats shortly. CalJW 04:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename. - TexasAndroid 16:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The English speaking countries in Oceania (which is the great majority of them) use Commonwealth English. More than half of the population of Oceania lives in Australia, and of all the countries in the world Australia is the one for which using "transportation" instead of "transport" is most inappropriate. Rename CalJW 04:14, 1 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was speedy delete. the wub "?!" 15:20, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Misspelled duplicate of Category:Transport in the Netherlands Antilles (with an "s" in Netherlands). Delete CalJW 04:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was speedy delete. the wub "?!" 15:22, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The original creator of the cat blanked it; since the cat already exists at Category:Ice hockey in Spain, which follows convention-- Confuzion 03:49, 1 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensous. - TexasAndroid 16:53, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensous. - TexasAndroid 16:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The first named category only has the one subcategory and it invites POV article selection. The subject area is much better covered within the less pov and widely used Category:Environment by country system. Delete both Sumahoy 03:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete. - TexasAndroid 16:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
There is a category with the more specific, accurate name Category:Georgetown University residence halls. Mah58@georgetown.edu 02:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC) reply