- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at
WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
Operator:
DatGuy (
talk ·
contribs ·
SUL ·
edit count ·
logs ·
page moves ·
block log ·
rights log ·
ANI search)
Time filed: 18:04, Tuesday, September 13, 2016 (
UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Converts WikiProject Belgrade to WikiProject Serbia/Belgrade task force
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Wikipedia:Bot_requests#WikiProject_Belgrade_to_WikiProject_Serbia.2FBelgrade_task_force
Edit period(s): One time run, perhaps once every month if some people accidentally add {{WikiProject Belgrade}}
Estimated number of pages affected: 1316 transclusion(s) found from
Template:WikiProject Belgrade
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No
Function details: Not much else to it, really. I've tested it already at
User:DatBot/sandbox. I've worked a bit with @
MusikAnimal and
Samtar:, and they gave me a heads up.
Discussion
- {{
BAGAssistanceNeeded}} I realise that this template should only be used after 7 days, but this is a fairly simple task. No real need for thorough testing or etc.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs 13:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
Approved for trial (50 edits or 5 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. —
xaosflux
Talk 04:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Added to AWB manual mode list. —
xaosflux
Talk 04:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
Trial complete., @
Xaosflux: The first few edits had a small issue with the RegEx. All the edits since 17:57 should be all perfect.
Contribs.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs 16:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Added to AWB automatic mode list. —
xaosflux
Talk 17:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Approved for extended trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. OK, please re-run - automatic AWB mode has been enabled as well for this part of the trial. Please mark your edits as 'minor' as well. Also, please be sure not to use your bot account for discussions such as here:
Special:Diff/739579102. It can be easy to mix up accounts during testing, one thing I usually do it open a second browser for any manual checking under the bot account (or a private browser instance). —
xaosflux
Talk 17:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
Trial complete., @
Xaosflux and
Magioladitis: Contribs
here, extremely sorry that most of the edits weren't tagged as minor. I loaded the wrong setting. I've also followed your recommendation on my talk page.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs 17:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
DatGuy on pages like
Talk:List of Belgrade neighbourhoods and suburbs, you
lowered the importance rating from High to Low ; on [[Talk:Belgrade Marathon] it went from Mid to Low; on
Talk:Ada Ciganlija it went from Top to High. What logic are you using for dealing with this parameter? —
xaosflux
Talk 16:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
Xaosflux: Extremely sorry for the 2 days wait, I had to re-work the entire code. The major think in the rework is some bugfixes and adding Belgrade-importance. On my
sandbox, I'm doing different scenarios that I can think of.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs 14:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
- What is the "expected" behavior for varying importance (inherit higher, lower, merge, etc) ? —
xaosflux
Talk 14:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
- @
Xaosflux: If the importance is the same, then it will replace "Belgrade" with Serbia and add |Belgrade=y|Belgrade-importance=what was the importance of WikiProject Belgrade, see
[1]. If the importance is different, then it will add |Belgrade=y|Belgrade-importance=what was the importance of WikiProject Belgrade, see
[2]. Not sure if that explains it clearly enough.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs 15:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
- So if Serbia project has this as "TOP" importance, but Belgrade has it as "LOW" importance - they expect the article will now be "LOW" correct? —
xaosflux
Talk 14:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
@
Xaosflux: No. The end result will be WikiProject Serbia|class=|importance=top|Belgrade=y|Belgrade-importance=low. Don't forget that there is a parameter for Belgrade-importance.
-
Approved for extended trial (30 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - hopefully this will be the last one. —
xaosflux
Talk 11:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
Trial complete.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs 16:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
reply
Approved. —
xaosflux
Talk 02:11, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at
WT:BRFA.