Comment - I would like to support, unfortunately, it is already nominated into the Holding Area at the moment. It is no. 252 on the Holding Area.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk)
22:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Thank you for pointing out my mistake. Please feel free to remove this nomination if you feel that's appropriate. --
CSJJ104 (
talk)
10:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Currently just a list. Would benefit readers by being fleshed out, edited so lay readers can understand it, and increasing the depth of the coverage (ie making it from a list into a discursive format). --
Tom (LT) (
talk)
01:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment There's a
PROD up on it at the moment as it hasn't been updated in over 7 years. Might not be notable enough to keep. --☣Anarchyte☣09:49, 30 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose - A very basic article that doesn't really need to exist. It would be better if it was in the "
Culture" article with its own section. --Anarchyte11:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The annual
Dance Valleydancemusic festival in the Netherlands. Such music festivals typically include a large temporary stage, are held outdoors, and include other attractions such as food,
performance art and other social activities.
A Level 4 vital article in Geography and an article on a sovereign state which still needs a large number of references adding as well as general improvement from C-class.
Rubbishcomputer14:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Support-It hasn't been given an importance rating but in addition to Anarchyte's points it has no references, is advert like, needs a total rewrite, needs expert attention... and has over 4000 views in the past 30 days.
Rubbishcomputer22:25, 5 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Level 4 Vital importance article. Was once rated Good Article but became badly neglected & fell into disrepair. Substantial interest: 3746 hits in 1st week June. Been extensively reworked over past few weeks but still plenty of room for improvement -- esp. consistent citation style, etc.
41.162.131.130 (
talk) 18:28, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
41.162.131.130 (
talk)
11:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Receives significant page views. Some room for expansion, and would benefit from organization, copy editing, images, layout, more sources and updating (2010s section). It's the main article for a series of articles about the history of video games (see box at right). North America100002:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Support-Page views, Top importance in Wikiprojects Computing and Video games and High importance in WikiProject Japan, only C-class, original research.
Rubbishcomputer17:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose-
This shows there are over 2000 mid-importance law articles like this one- from random clicking it appears more than one tenth of these are stubs. Not important enough.
Rubbishcomputer17:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Needs to "kick" the standards higher, I mean, this article needs more improvement, especially because it has a good potential of improving.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk)
09:45, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about the media franchise which includes a novel and two films, among other things.
Coin945 (
talk)
18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Article in need of help bascially. Formatting, possible small expansions on different parts of the mans life of crime. Crimes that spans from USA to Australia. --
BabbaQ (
talk)
08:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article explores the concept in general rather than talking about a specific country.
Coin945 (
talk)
18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article is about the actual concept of "person of the year" and how it has been realised in various contexts.
Coin945 (
talk)
18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation pages are always extremely easy to expand. This would-be article groups all leader-related uses together and explains how the term "captain" is used across various fields in this capacity, while all unrelated items (like movies called Captain) are moved to
Captain (disambiguation).
Coin945 (
talk)
18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)reply
A sport that is starting to become popular in many places worldwide. It is a sport broadcast on Eurosport. It needs expansion. --
BabbaQ (
talk)
23:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Support - very popular sport. Looking at Google Books there is
over 5,000 books. Would be easy to get references. Out of the 1000 pictures in commons, there should be an interesting picture that can be picked for the article. = picked one!--
Doug Coldwell (
talk)
11:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Support- I got completely wrong statistics and opposed this as a result, either because I was tired and clicked on the wrong thing or because my computer was playing up. Sorry for any confusion I may have caused. Support because it's a high importance stub and it's got over 2,000 page views in the past 30 days.
Rubbishcomputer17:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Support-Level 1 vital article, over 90,000 page views in the past 30 days (more than 100 times as many as this page!), about something so everyday, should at least be a Good article.
Rubbishcomputer19:14, 4 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Turn the enormous list of forms of address into a table and the rest of the article turns out to be alarmingly short.
TBP25 (
talk)
12:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Support. Absolutely rubbish referencing, about a basic subject, ranked as top importance in Wikiproject law and a Level 4 vital article in society.
Rubbishcomputer19:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Is this actually a serious thing? Because I've never heard of it before, and I'm usually quite knowledgeable about sport.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
20:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose - As per Anarchyte, it covers all the points, is well referenced and has good pictures, what needs drastically improving on it?
Joseph2302 (
talk)
01:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose - this is an old type of Trojan horse that does not affect today's society. It did prior to 2005 or so, as it had affected
XP's. The virus was discontinued on late 2004 and would have its viral issues solved by most antiviruses.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk)
06:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Support Definitely can be improved, and has reasonable high page view stats, 1300 in 30 days. In reply to concerns mentioned above, no it is not relevant today, but neither are the historical articles we improve. --
CSJJ104 (
talk)
19:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Northamerica1000: Why has this been marked as unapproved? It seems to meet neither the criteria of 21 days with no discussion, last comment was 7 June, and does not have three net opposed votes, as indicated at the top of this page is necessary. --
CSJJ104 (
talk)
10:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)reply
@
CSJJ104: The way things have been done here in the past, unless I'm missing something, is that after three opposes, unless there are also three supports, entries are not approved. At the top of the page, it states, "Unsuccessful nominations can be archived after 21 days of no discussion or after 3 net opposing votes." North America100016:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment – I get it now. Since there's a support above, the total net opposing votes total 2. As such, I have removed the unapproved template above. North America100000:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose Low importance on WikiProjects Switzerland and History, there are
2031 articles needing copy edit as I write this, some of them many times longer than this.
Rubbishcomputer00:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose - you don't simply ask for citations in this WikiProject. This WikiProject seems better suited for improving the articles' content, not really so much the citations.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk -
contributions)
04:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)reply
A Level 4 vital article in People, an article on a President of the Philippines from 1986 to 1992, appears to be seriously lacking references in places, should be easy to improve. Emphasising the article's importance, a Did You Know...? fact from it has been featured on the main page 6 years in a row and a news item related to the article was on the main page in 2009
verify.
Rubbishcomputer12:58, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Support It hasn't had a DYK every year, it's had an "On this day" which is for selected anniversaries. Definitely still shows its importance though, and article needs some improving.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
11:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The refimprove template doesn't do it justice; there are easily 200 unsourced statements in this article, they just don't have cn tags. This article has also been marked as needing immediate attention.
Rubbishcomputer23:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose All it needs is 200 citations,and if you look at the articles of the saints, most of them will probably have citations you can use.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
23:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Neutrality problems since May 2014, viewed often, poor referencing. While there are many articles with neutrality problems this one seems important regardless of how it is ranked; it is something I imagine some people have heard of but few have in-depth knowledge of. If Wikipedia had a good article on this it would improve public knowledge.
Rubbishcomputer12:42, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply