The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No evidence of notability, warning has been in place for over 7 years. I cannot find sources to indicate notability has been attained since the last nomination in 2011, which was closed as no consensus.
glman (
talk)
18:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak delete: Rather prolific author and is talked about a ton in the religious media, but a distinct lack of book reviews in "mainstream" media (for lack of a better word). This
[1] review in religious media is typical... Some scattered mentions here
[2] or
[3]. We'd need more of these last two types of sources for this to have a chance to be notable here. Was hoping this would pass AUTHOR.
Oaktree b (
talk)
00:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. I have added another reference which squeezes him over the line on
WP:GNG. But the Google scholar citations are actually pretty good, including 98 for Tactics.
StAnselm (
talk)
23:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.