The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep, I think the point of
WP:BASIC is that there needs to be a way to account for subjects that have enough non-trivial coverage to amount to substantial coverage.
WP:NCORP rules out non-notable awards as passing mentions that amount to trivial coverage. However, if we deem these awards to be notable in the field, then the subject probably passes BASIC.-
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
01:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep meets GNG especially when non-English sources are added in. I did see a lot of advertorial coverage but I expect that with all travel companies.
Gleeanon409 (
talk)
16:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Adverts do not convey notability. Care to share the significant coverage you have found? It may improve the article.
Kleuske (
talk)
16:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Those are basically adverts, based on info provided by the company themselves, a.k.a.
churnalism. They even get the foto credits. That’s hardly the kind of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, CORPDEPTH calls for.
Kleuske (
talk)
08:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Most are brief mentions, however they can yield some content to build a good article meeting GNG. This is also an older entertainment company so much of the coverage they got was never online so that shouldn’t be held against them. In their field they seem to be highly regarded.
Gleeanon409 (
talk)
12:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
comment All of those Out Traveler would collectively considered ONE SOURCE, and it's not totally an independent source especially if Zoom Vacations has a business relationship with the publication as an advertiser. NBC only has a trivial mention. See
WP:MULTSOURCES.
Graywalls (
talk)
10:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.