The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - not a shred of notability here. Not helped by the author trying to subvert the deletion process and posting almost simultaneous drafts and main space articles. Fails
WP:GNG. VelellaVelella Talk 12:03, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
hope you will get the details about the film including synopses and posters. Praxidicae you wan to observe the articles clearly, including each and every reference, before adding Deletion tags. authors spent lot of time to create an article. blindly adding the Deletion tags = to wasting the time of Administrators = miss using your rights. i was created this Article in
Neutral point of view,with
using common sense, do it what you want. i respect Administrators decision.
Sudhakar naidu 118 (
talk)
22:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Sudhakar naidu 118, you're just citing the same single Times of India article over and over. Do you have other news articles to show this film is notable? Not blogs or movie databases. Otherwise this should be thrown back to draft or deleted and not to be considered until it is actually released in the theater with proper critic reviews, box office, and other reception information.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
18:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Sudhakar naidu 118, Bookmyshow is a random film database, Filmyhut, Newsjizz, and Movie Manthra are questionable as RS. Can you find some other notable news agencies to provide information on the film?
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
18:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)reply
AngusWOOF i respect you as a senior. but i do not accept thrown back to draft, deleted this article because There are thousands of unreleased film articles on Wikipedia. unreleased films are always like plants, zinga is not a world famous film. but notable in
Telugu language. it should be on Wikipedia meets
WP:UCS.
Sudhakar naidu 118 (
talk)
19:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Sudhakar naidu 118, if it's notable in Telugu, can you find some Telugu news articles that cover the film?
WP:UCS does not apply.
WP:EXISTENCE is more what is being presented. There are thousands of unreleased films, and millions of YouTube videos, but not every film gets an article. The more applicable criteria is
WP:NFF "Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines." and "In the case of animated films, reliable sources must confirm that the film is clearly out of the pre-production process, meaning that the final animation frames are actively being drawn and/or rendered, and final recordings of voice-overs and music have commenced" There's nothing to write about for the production of this film. I suggested going back to draft because it could then be developed there as you said, like a plant, until it's ready to bloom. That's what the draftspace is for. But that didn't happen, so here we are.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
20:36, 7 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Sudhakar naidu 118, if you want to use common sense
WP:UCS, then apply
WP:NFILM Notability for Films and specifically
WP:NFF notability for upcoming films. I've already shown you the phrases that apply to questioning the notability for this article. I have no idea how the seed became a planet. That defies common sense.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
22:15, 9 May 2019 (UTC)reply
AngusWOOF using
WP:UCS for break the break the rules. when the Wikipedia policies and guidelines looks week we can use this
WP:UCS and this film meets
WP:NFILM, this is not a animation movie only animation films want complet the production, and also the post production. zinga is a normal film
WP:NFF says normal films are notable when the complete the production. zinga was already completed the production stage. so NFF is dos not apply for this film. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sudhakar naidu 118 (
talk •
contribs)
Sudhakar naidu 118, you still haven't brought any new evidence it meets
WP:NFILM, but you keep pushing
WP:UCS over and over, which is a problematic argument along the lines of
WP:JUSTAPOLICY "Keep because we should ignore all rules!" . Also just because you added the article to Wikiproject India or Wikiproject Film doesn't mean it's notable. Those Wikiprojects have already been notified above about the deletion.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
20:25, 10 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Administrator note I've history merged the draft into the article since it was a copy and paste move and closed the MFD.
This was the last revision of the draft, and
this is the difference between the article at the time this discussion started and the draft. —
JJMC89 (
T·C)
03:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Retarget
Zinga (2019 film) to director and salt. None of the director's other films have articles and there isn't really anything special about this one at this stage. Tendentious editing/subversion without improvement.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
03:49, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Actually, a very cursory look at the article shows a clear delete, which is against the wishes of the canvassing user, so I feel comfortable making the !vote.
WP:GNG and no prejudice on recreation if the film becomes notable later.
SportingFlyerT·C11:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)reply
yes i was just asked for review this page. need help sorry Reyk i am new to Wikipedia i don't know how to send neutral message. but thank you for response.
Sudhakar naidu 118 (
talk)
13:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC)reply
i was Ignored this rules using
WP:UCS because this rule supported only to the big production films. NFF does not apply for this film because Zinga was completed principal photography.
Sudhakar naidu 118 (
talk)
04:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.