The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This alleged pretention to the Chinese throne is way too speculative (the Ming Dynasty having been destroyed several centuries prior, and even if it were actually a "live" claim, the ancestral tracing is too distant to be reliable). There is no other claim to notability. Delete. --
Nlu (
talk) 19:11, 15 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. The full article to the only reference can be found
here. Nowhere does it specifically call Zhu Yunzhong a descendant of Zhu Yuanzhang. Even if he were, that's clearly no basis of notability.
Timmyshin (
talk) 21:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - no indication of notability. -
Zanhe (
talk) 02:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.