The result was delete. consensus that he fails WP:N/and/or WP:POLITICIAN JForget 22:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Anonymous political figure in a vanishingly small party. Recently created by a editor who admits that he is a member of said party. Same editor silently removed my prod tag, so here we are Bigdaddy1981 ( talk) 01:34, 31 August 2009 (UTC) reply
I removed the POLITICIAN tag as it didn't meet the criteria, sorry about that. Troublemaker1949 ( talk) 03:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC) reply
What's your source for this pearl of wisdom? Troublemaker1949 ( talk) 03:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC) reply
What are you talking about? This is NOT a majority vote, it doesn't count anyway, so it's pretty pointless to do this. Troublemaker1949 ( talk) 07:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Oh my, is not that not allowed, so sorry. Troublemaker1949 ( talk) 00:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply
I've raised Troublemaker1949s behaviout here:
Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts
GainLine
♠
♥ 16:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
reply