The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Feedback taken on board. I've added more information to the stub, focusing on subject's life before the company. Has been subject of media coverage in his own right. Naturally as the original author I vote to keep.
Mollybloomin (
talk)
08:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Lots of sources
here plus 90+ pageviews per day suggests a keeper (my personal criteria suggests that pageviews correlates with notability although I know it's not an official criterion for inclusion.)--
Tomwsulcer (
talk)
22:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep. Key, long standing player, in dodgy forex and biinary option scene. Potential fot notability to inrease due to civil lawsuits and enforcement following recent legislation.
Icewhiz (
talk)
03:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.