The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
She is a political candidate for a local election who has never held political office and despite the local controversy she does not appear to be otherwise notable
Grahame (
talk)
01:11, 21 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete.She is just a political candidate and has not made any revolutionary step to be notable in the field of politics so clearly fails
WP:NPOL and the lack of reliable independent sources fails the notability
WP:GNG.
Vinodbasker (
talk)
12:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Being a city council candidate is not a notability claim that gets a person into Wikipedia in and of itself, and any controversy about her outside affiliations just makes her a
WP:BLP1E no matter how widely it gets covered. And there's no serious claim to preexisting notability as a journalist, either, since other than the "background mentions of her prior career" in the campaign coverage (which is not how you make a person's prior career notable enough to override their lack of notability as a politician), the only other source for her journalism career is a piece in which she's the bylined author and not the subject of the coverage.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:44, 23 October 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.