The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Full disclosure, I am the creator. Extremely lazy nom with no rationale besides
WP:ITSNOTNOTABLE. Article has been clearly heavily referenced and has a fairly large reception section, as well as the potential for much more expansion from one of the most critically praised games ever created. To come to the conclusion that it has no coverage, I'd assume the article was not even read a single time before pressing the AfD button.ZXCVBNM (
TALK)17:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - I can't see any reason to delete this well-sourced content. Some might argue that a merge to
Bloodborne would be appropriate but I would oppose that as it would then give too much weight to Yharnam in an already very large article. A separate article makes sense.
Spiderone17:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge: This should be merged back to Bloodborne, the parent article, given that (1) the parent article is not too long (2) how underdeveloped the development section is and (3) the city itself is not independently notable. The sources are mainly discussing the game or its expansion, rather than this fictional city.
OceanHok (
talk)
17:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep mentions in three notable RS means GNG is met. You want to negotiate a merge? Be our guest... but this is not the right lever to move in that direction.
Jclemens (
talk)
02:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.