The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable, unscheduled air-charter service lacking significant coverage in secondary sources to support
WP:COMPANYttonyb1 (
talk) 16:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom.
RP459 (
talk) 18:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep A brief news search turns up what looks like reasonable sources.
[1].
[2] is really short,
[3] looks good but is behind a wall,
[4] seems fine as does
[5]. The sources listed seem local, but
[6] isn't. I'm curious if others thought these sources weren't enough or didn't search.
Hobit (
talk) 19:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep Hobit's links, and in particular
this article which mentions the previous scheduled, international services should be enough to contitute 'significant coverage'. ∗
\ / (
⁂) 08:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete no refs - nothing that asserts notability>
NBeale (
talk) 21:33, 20 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Snuggle This article just needs some love. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
75.100.83.208 (
talk) 07:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep. Poorly written is not a reason to delete an article. While the references may be weak, I'm not convinced that this airline is not notable. Having an IATA and ICAO code along with sources says keep and cleanup.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 00:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep per Vegaswikian. Hobit's links provides multiple, reliable sources. Typically, local companies like this will primarily be featured in local and industry sources and don't receive much attention from national media, but that doesn't make them non-notable. --
Hawaiian717 (
talk) 00:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep just needs a bit more history and content.
MilborneOne (
talk) 07:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.