- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( talk) 13:10, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Xóchitl Rodríguez ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Inadequately sourced BLP of a small-city mayor. Woodland CA is a city where the mayoralty rotates annually among the city councillors rather than being directly elected, so it's not a city where the mayor gets an automatic presumption of notability just for existing, but the referencing here is not solid enough to get her over WP:GNG as the subject of significant press coverage -- two of the footnotes here are the city's own primary source website about itself, which is not a source that assists in making a mayor notable, and the other two (one of which is repeated twice for the appearance, but not the reality, of three) are just the routine coverage of her initial selection in the local media -- this is a depth of sourcing that absolutely every mayor of everywhere could always show, so it's not nearly enough to make her special. Bearcat ( talk) 23:42, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 20:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 20:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete a mayor of a place with less than 60,000 is not default notable and nothing else suggests the person here is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:56, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I agree mayor of such a small city is not necessarily notable Alex-h ( talk) 23:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Simply not enough coverage to meet WP:NPOL notability guidelines; only coverage is in local sources. Jmertel23 ( talk) 17:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.