The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
My searches found absolutely nothing aside from mirrors and the author seemed to have started other articles but I haven't found anything for this. Inviting
Calamondin12 and
TheGGoose.
SwisterTwistertalk 01:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. No indication that this prize ever existed; could be a hoax. Among other things, the attribution to a "so far unidentified Singaporean patron of the arts" is the kind of vague statement commonly found in hoaxes. The rationale behind a $10,000 cash prize for a philanthropist also seems odd. If this article has any basis in reality at all, it may have been an idea that was proposed but never came to fruition. In any case, if the Wollen-Blohm Prize had ever been actually awarded, we should have heard about it somewhere, since such awards generally attract at least some notice in
reliable sources.
Calamondin12 (
talk) 02:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete It's a likely hoax upon looking up its search results.
TheGGoose (
talk) 13:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete as blatant hoax: have tagged it. --
Rubbishcomputer 22:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.