The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. The nom hasn't even bothered with
searching for sources as these have all been nominated within seconds of each other. No objections to speedy renomination by anyone except the nom.
(non-admin closure) –
Davey2010Talk 01:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep: King's Counsel, and according to
WP:LAWYERS "A lawyer who has received an appointment that indicates pre-eminence within the profession, such as Queen's Counsel or serjeant at law or senior counsel, shall be treated in the same manner as a person who satisfies criteria 1 of WP:ANYBIO (which relates to significant and well known awards or honours)".
DuncanHill (
talk) 01:27, 13 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep: A lawyer who reached a senior position, was involved in academic activities, was an author and was a political activist too. There are reliable sources documenting this. He passes
WP:GNG.
Drchriswilliams (
talk) 18:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.